| [Customer Reviews] Write your own review |
This card is the biggest creature ever.
It's casting to of 10 mana is cut and dry,and paying 2 green each upkeep is nothing (most of your creatures should cost less than 8)
-- By Monk of Avon from I Cannot say on February 14, 2003 |
|
This is the most powerful undercosted creature i have everseen. 10 mana for a 13/13 is incredible!
And its morph is 9 mana which is even more incredible! Its downside for being so cheap mana wise and playing wise is that u have to pay 2 forests to keep it alive every upkeep which doesn't really matter because your up keep is after your untap step. Awsome card. Anyone who doesn't have this card in his/her's green (generally power) deck or doesn't have it and doesn't want to buy it is a fool.
-- By Magicfreakboy from New York, NY USA on February 24, 2003 |
|
This card just plain sucks. A 13/13 without trample with that mana cost is horrible.
-- By Chris Thomas from Mannassas, Va USA on February 28, 2003 |
|
EWWWWWWW, pricy and can get chumped by an elf, falls to edicts and bloods, this heft thing ist good anywhere because if u reanimate it early in a black deck, you wont be able o sustain uts GG upkeep costs :(
-- By Jeff Allen from El Reno, OK USA on March 02, 2003 |
|
Now I know that 10 mana is a lot, but it's a 13/13. It doesn't have trample, but any beast deck needs it and should probably run some Krosan Groundshakers anyway.
-- By Magic Genius from Your Mom on March 14, 2003 |
|
This is the strongest creature i've ever seen. The only problem is it's mana cost, and having to pay 2 forests each turn. Besides that, it's an excellent creature.
-- By Anonymous from Portugal on May 11, 2003 |
|
10 mana for a 13/13 that's a good thing and morph so its not stuck in your hand and this works real nice with an elvish piper,trample is the only thing missing but there are plenty of ways to add that. 2 green for an upkeep not so bad I've seen worse.
-- By Cameron Caro from Concord,CA,USA on June 25, 2003 |
|
this card has help me win two world tournaments it is one of the best cards ive seen
-- By Anonymous from titusville,pennsylvania USA on October 21, 2003 |
|
The Krosan Cloudscraper is tremendous. There is no creature thatīs more naturally powerful. The thing of having to pay 2 mana every turn could be annoying, but thatīs pretty much it. Itīs an awesome pair with krosan restorer and elvish piper. your remaining cards should be pretty easily put down. However, donīt overestimate the card, you should be in quite a lot of trouble if your opponent has cards that attack creatures directly like fodder cannons. If the Cloudscraper is hit a lot, OWWWWWWWWWWWWWCH!!!!
-- By Polo Contreras from Mexico City, MEXICO on November 25, 2003 |
|
great card with sneak attack , awesome !
-- By me from abudza . usa on December 03, 2003 |
|
Too hard to get out. I used one for a while and i had a hard time getting it out. Period
-- By AcidPants220 from bloomington mn on December 06, 2003 |
|
The only deck this card should be used in is a Sutured ghoul/Krosan Cloudscraper reanimator deck. With two of those bad boys in the graveyard with the ghoul you can put a 26/26 trampler into play turn two with exhume, or reanimate
-- By Anonymous from Texas on December 21, 2003 |
|
This card is awesome but the only problem is it cost too much mana
-- By Austin Archey from Edison, NJ USA on January 15, 2004 |
|
I think it's an ok card but not a good one to play with.
-- By joey zabel from NY NY on January 20, 2004 |
|
I have this card and by the time you get it in to play the battle is probably over. With a mana cost of seven colorless-three forests and two forests every turn this card is a worthless piece of crap!
-- By Anonymous from Los Angelos, CA USA on March 30, 2004 |
|
Normally I wouldn't give it such a high rating, lacking, as it does, trample. But the morph gives it the last star. This card has a way of sneaking up on the other guy . . . In a big, nasty way.
-- By Anonymous from anonymous on May 03, 2004 |
|
THIS CARD RULES!!!! (assuming that you don't suck so much that you don't have 2 forests per turn) (o_o)
-- By poopsmith666 from Toronto, ON Canada on June 07, 2004 |
|
I think this is a cool card. When I play magic I usually get this out everytime I get it in my hand. All you need to do is make a deck with Rampant Growths and Wood Elves and you can get it out real quick.
-- By magic fan from Townsville, QLD Australia on September 02, 2004 |
|
NO CREATURE CAN BE MORE POWERFUL THAN IT!!!!!!!
-- By boris chiu from hong kong on January 21, 2005 |
|
I rate this 2 because it isnt to bad but mana cost is to much and trample would be a nice addation
-- By Gregory from missouri on April 10, 2005 |
|
The card is the most powerful known. If you know how to use it, and lucky enough you can get it out in round six! Cryptic Gateway, and two small beast can get this massive creature out reather easily. Just give it Horned Helm and you have a 14/14 out for free!
-- By Anonymous from In front of his computer on June 11, 2005 |
|
For all you people who are complaining about the fact that it doesn't have trample just get a heartwood shard out and pay a forest and it has trample.
-- By Angel Lover from Mass USA on July 10, 2005 |
|
awesome card if used with elvish piper, bloodshot cyclops, and stalking vengeance. Bring out with piper sac with blood and do 26 damage.
-- By Anonymous from KOSOVO on December 17, 2006 |
|
While it ha some narrow uses (mostly with Sutured Ghoul), this card is really expensive, slow and weak. By turn 10 your opponent will likely have some men to throw at it or some bounce/counter/removal effect. Most finishers have evasion, untargetability or some other powerful ability that says "If you don't kill me in 2-3 turns, you're as good as dead", and this card has none of the above.
-- By Anonymous from San Juan, PR on February 27, 2007 |
|
use predators strike and look 1/1 elf go very bye bye.plus the upkeep is not that bad.
-- By alqo kane from berlin germany on March 04, 2007 |
|
Kher's keep = Cloudscraper's worst enemy. If you attach rancor, then we're talking, otherwise break out the chump blockers, this fool will not be running amok.
-- By Anonymous from Jurai on March 16, 2007 |
|
its an awsome card being a 13/13 but it needs protection so if your opponent plays something like premature burial or visara the dreadful it wont be a waste of 10 mana and there aren't many green regenerate cards so once its out you have to enchant it with somthing like inviobility but it could still have all its damage negated with something like dream fighters or circle of protection green.
-- By Anonymous from fruita, co USA on April 14, 2007 |
|
Ever heard of Elvish piper or Norwood priestess? Turn 3 and you have a 13/13. Pluss not all Beasts need Trample.
-- By Anonymous from the Milky way on June 03, 2007 |
|
haha amazing but you could get more power for cheaper with a whitewood armor, have you ever tried whitewood armor on molimo when you control 10 forest???
-- By Anonymous from dark and deep dungeon on August 06, 2007 |
|
great card. . . 2 bad 4 its enormous mana cost though. . . this card is a must 4 any beast deck. . .plus if you're playing with a green/red beast deck, this card is unstoppable with contested cliffs. . . . . .
-- By Anonymous from Nowhere on December 19, 2007 |
|
Awesome card! If you add Griffin Guide and Dragon Fangs, this card could be unstopable.
-- By Gunner Petzold from Old Bridge, NJ on February 24, 2008 |
|
It has too many problems to be worth putting in all but the most basic beginner decks. No trample, drains your mana as long as you want it out, and its price is so high that if you don't use mana excellerators you will not have a turn to get it out. Furthermore, it lacks the invulnerability that darksteel colussus has, and the evasion that Thorn Elemental or so many others have. By turn 10, if you have not allready won or lost, this card can be trumped by a card as simple as Revered Dead.
-- By Geckle from RI on March 01, 2008 |
|
This is a great card only thing missing is trample and you know u can "add" trample to it theres lots of cards to do that also the mana cost isnt that bad if u have fast bond it wont take that long if u dont have the mana ....dont use it!
-- By Jason from somewhere in Nevada on March 21, 2008 |
|
Jokulmorder is better than this
-- By gougou from China on May 13, 2008 |
|
(
