|
|
|
 |
| Rarity : R | Casting Cost : 1   | | Card Type : Creature — Angel | | Card Text : Flying, vigilance, haste | | Pwr/Tgh : 3/4 | | Artist : rk post |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipping weight: 0.003 pounds
|
|
|
| [Customer Reviews] Write your own review |
This card is one of the best attackers of all red cards, let alone white and blue. A 3/4 flying for 4 mana is not bad, but when it comes with a couple of other abilities that allow it to constantly pound your opponent, it rules. -- By Nate from The Universe on October 16, 2001 |
|
Lightning Angel is an overall good card, but it is not the best. For four mana you can instead buy a Blazing Specter or a Skizzik. She can easily be killed not to mention. A good card in most decks, but she is overhyped right now. -- By Anonymous from El Paso, TX USA on December 26, 2001 |
|
NOT TOO GOOD. ONLY WORKS IN A RED WHIT AND BLUE DECK. BUT I HAVE IN MY RED WHITE AND BLUE DECK -- By PHANTOM from BOSTON, MA on April 19, 2002 |
|
Not too good of a card. Only works in a red white and blue deck -- By phantom from brookline on April 27, 2002 |
|
Make a white/blue/red deck with Lightning Angels an Raka Sanctuarys. And have a fun! -- By Mtg God from Latvia on January 31, 2004 |
|
why not giv this five stars? it have hast, flying and attaking dosent cos it to tap and it is a 3/4 to 1RWB
i just dont aunderstands whats the prablem with this card. -- By Bario the Big from norway elverum on March 03, 2006 |
|
lightning angel eh, i can see why people dont like it too much due to the miss america colors (red white and blue), but still, ive seen decks that throw these out turn four, with angelic pages out, mayhem to the max. id give it a five, but 3 color, and toughness being on the weak side brought it down...however overall, its a very good card...more people should make decks around this card -- By Paradox from behind you, foolish mortal on December 05, 2006 |
|
A mini Akroma, so what is has three colours? I'm not saying its beter then akroma but arkoma doesn't cost 4. -- By Anonymous from England on November 23, 2007 |
|
overall a four star card just because it's casting colors limit the amount of play time it will receive, but it got the extra star for being downright cool -- By Anonymous from sudbury,ontario,canada on January 05, 2008 |
|
|
|
|